Users qualified to peer review average more money and have more work available. Every user that meets the 98% contract minimum on a consistent basis is qualified to peer review. The vetted accuracy of a peer reviewer ensures that entered data is sufficiently accurate to pass onto clients as a final product.
As a peer reviewer, you will be fed completed forms to verify tags are accurate and to correct the ones that aren't.
To approve a tag as accurate, press the Enter key while its selected. If it's a non match or tagged as a match when it's not, make additional searches for the voter and tag whatever the result. Sigtrack only registers a correction if your tag differs from the original. Verify that soft matches meet the strict criteria and, when based on name uniqueness, that the name really is unique. Add any missing tags, and delete tags that should not exist. Move tags if they are assigned to the wrong lines - do not retag them one by one. If none of the tags are hard matches, check if the jurisdiction is correct. If not, reset the file under the Task Options menu.
After approving or correcting a tag, Sigtrack will auto-select the next unreviewed line.
Light grey tags do not need to be peer reviewed. Skip them unless you happen to notice one is wrong. You will get paid for correcting a grey tag, but not to approve a grey tag.
Be careful. Once you submit a form as peer reviewed, there is no fixing it. It is final. Do not submit a form unless you are certain all tags are accurate.
If the specs do not require tagging a voter for a given deficiency code, but a voter was captured anyway, leave the voter info intact. That is not considered an error.
If a tag is subjective, which should be rare, side with the original tag. Otherwise, there will be an endless loop of disputes, which wastes everyone's time and income potential.
If nothing needs to be changed other than a deficiency code, press - (minus) for a popup dialog to change the code without having to reprocess the tag from scratch.
Press the space bar to jump to the next unreviewed line.
Pay is a small piece rate shown in the job Terms, plus a portion of the base rate depending on how many errors you correct. Keep in mind, the originator will view your corrections and can challenge some of them, which sends that tag to another peer reviewer for re-review. Each false correction that gets flipped during a dispute costs your earnings for two corrections. For this reason, peer reviewers discuss edge cases to reach a consensus before submitting a file.